Participants’ feeling out-of peers’ similarity out-of perceptions into homosexuals was reviewed using two similar activities, except towards the peers’ gender

Participants’ feeling out-of peers’ similarity out-of perceptions into homosexuals was reviewed using two similar activities, except towards the peers’ gender

The questions comprehend: “Network the quantity one to greatest identifies how likely the feelings towards the homosexuals resembles new attitude most of your [ male / ladies ] family relations features with the homosexuals.” Each other issues were replied using an excellent 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Nothing) so you can cuatro (A great deal). Early in the day research has found these materials so you can mirror respondents’ normative thinking on gay anyone (Herek & Capitanio, 1996). These products presented a great Cronbach’s ? out-of .70.


I counted religiosity having fun with four factors: (a) importance of spiritual otherwise religious viewpoints; (b) volume regarding chapel otherwise temple attendance previously 12 months; (c) volume in order to events sponsored because of the its religious category in the past year; and you will (d) prayer volume in earlier times few days. Significance of religious philosophy is actually mentioned playing with a 4-point size anywhere between 1 (Perhaps not very important whatsoever) to 4 (Crucial). The anastasia date object calculating participants’ attendance so you’re able to a chapel otherwise forehead when you look at the during the last seasons understand, “How frequently perhaps you have attended a church otherwise temple on the previous year?” Participants answered which by the choosing one of the following the half dozen categories: Never ever, From time to time a year, Once or twice annually, A few times thirty day period, Once a week, and more than weekly. The fresh new half a dozen respond to kinds for church attendance were together with useful for attendance so you’re able to sponsored spiritual incidents. Prayer volume is actually analyzed with six classes: Never, Several times thirty day period, Once or twice a month, Several minutes a week, Daily, or higher than just once a day. Other research has put equivalent measures from religiosity within surveys and discovered these to become consistently reliable (Herek & Gonzalez-Rivera, from inside the push). Religiosity activities had a Cronbach’s ? out of .80 within investigation.

Thinking for the Lesbians and Gays

The final part of the questionnaire included the fresh Language-translation of the new style of new Attitudes On the Lesbians and you can Gay (ATLG) Level (Herek, 1984). Which 20-items level are answered using an effective 5-section size ranging from 1 (Strongly differ) in order to 5 (Strongly consent). Respondents’ score was calculated if you take new imply around the points such you to large score reflect significantly more negative attitudes on the gay boys and you will people. Within the brand new variation, the shape are going to be put into a few ten-product subscales: this new Perceptions into the Lesbians (ATL) and the Thinking on the Gays (ATG) subscales. We translated the brand new ATLG level into Spanish-words immediately after which straight back translated regarding Foreign-language on the English to be certain equivalency between them sizes. Spanish-talking Puerto Rican anyone, which volunteered when you look at the a beneficial pre-sample pilot investigation, sensed the usage code compatible. Language and you can English items of your items’ stuff can be acquired within the Appendix A great.

Exploratory idea axis factor analyses with oblique rotation of one’s Foreign-language sort of the fresh ATLG Measure got around three issues: good Condemnation-Tolerance Factor (17 affairs; %), a personal-Expressive Foundation (you to item; 6.75%), and you may a standards Grounds (several situations; 6.51%). These about three components informed me sixty.9% of your own full difference. The informed me difference of these things try very similar to those people acquired into the Herek’s (1984) brand spanking new investigation. Adopting the Herek’s (1984) recommendation, i picked things loading high only toward part matrix of one’s Condemnation-Threshold grounds. Just after deleting step 3 situations (circumstances 2, 7, 12), we decided to as well as clean out a supplementary items (items 17) whilst decreased the fresh scale’s accuracy considerably. The newest ATLG measure concluded with sixteen-facts and you can informed me 55% of the complete variance. The thing loadings for three issues was presented for the Dining table step one .

Dining table 1

Herek’s ATLG Scale might have been applied in numerous racial organizations through the the usa having uniform Cronbach’s leader coefficients more than .87 (Herek, 2000). Given that size got never been useful an excellent Puerto Rican sample, the brand new ATLG-Foreign-language type showed reliability score (?=.93) like the individuals acquired by the Herek inside the a keen student take to (Herek, 1996). To lessen brand new inflation of Cronbach’s leader accuracy coefficient owed for the amount of activities, i parceled the newest sixteen activities towards the four element results. For each rating portrayed brand new mean worth per five-item ATL and ATG sign, correspondingly. Solution placement of facts from the their review purchased foundation loadings was indeed familiar with include the signs toward ATG and ATL indications, correspondingly. All-item indications had a .90 Cronbach’s alpha coefficient.